Study and optimization of process parameters for deformation machining stretching mode
Downloads
Published
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58414/SCIENTIFICTEMPER.2024.15.2.31Keywords:
Deformation machining, Surface roughness, Hardness, Grey Relation Analysis, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)Dimensions Badge
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Scientific Temper

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Monolithic thin-structure parts with intricate geometric designs are employed in a variety of aeronautical, medical, marine, and automotive applications, which include the moldlines of the fuselage, turbine blades, impellers, avionic shelves, irregular fins, prostheses, bone and joint support, and skull plates. The deformation machining process is the solution to this challenging and difficult-to-manufacture high-quality components with intricate narrow geometries at competitive prices. The aim of the present study is to assess the effect of process parameters of the deformation machining process wherein a thin, floor-like structure is created by milling and is then formed using a single-point incremental forming tool. Investigation involves the design and development of tooling required for the process followed by feasibility checking of the process. To examine the impact of different process parameters on the process response, the experiments were carried out using the design of experiments. The findings of this study indicate that different process parameters, including spindle speed, tool diameter, incremental step depth, and feed rate, have a substantial impact on the process response, like thickness, surface finish, and hardness. Uneven and non-uniform surface patterns during SEM indicate that it is needed to examine the impact of process parameters. This research involves the feasibility study of a new hybrid technique of deformation machining. Conventionally, a metallic structure is produced by joining various components through welding or by fastening. These methods require additional expenditure on equipment, storage, floor space, human resources, etc., with higher lead time. Joining increases weight and reduces fatigue strength. The creation of monolithic structures can eliminate all these disadvantages.Abstract
How to Cite
Downloads
Similar Articles
- Ramya Singh, Archana Sharma, Nimit Gupta, Nursing on the edge: An empirical exploration of gig workers in healthcare and the unseen impacts on the nursing profession , The Scientific Temper: Vol. 15 No. 01 (2024): The Scientific Temper
- S Rehan Ahmad, KDV Prasad, Seema Bhakuni, Amit Hedau, P B Shankar Narayan, P Parameswari, The role and relation of emotional intelligence with work-life balance for working women in job stress , The Scientific Temper: Vol. 14 No. 01 (2023): The Scientific Temper
- N. Ruba, A. S. A. Khadir, Session password Blum–Goldwasser cryptography based user three layer authentication for secured financial transaction , The Scientific Temper: Vol. 15 No. 01 (2024): The Scientific Temper
- Ahmed Mustefa, Efficacy of coffee farmers’ cooperatives in Gimbo Woreda, Kafa Zone, Ethiopia , The Scientific Temper: Vol. 14 No. 01 (2023): The Scientific Temper
- Ahmed Mustefa, Validating the dairy marketing performance of Mizan-Aman town, Bench-Sheko zone, Ethiopia , The Scientific Temper: Vol. 14 No. 01 (2023): The Scientific Temper
- Susithra N, Rajalakshmi K, Ashwath P, Performance analysis of compressive sensing and reconstruction by LASSO and OMP for audio signal processing applications , The Scientific Temper: Vol. 14 No. 01 (2023): The Scientific Temper
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.